Skip to main content
Compare · Simcenter thermal tools

Which Simcenter tool for which thermal problem.

Decision guide first, then two capability matrices — simulation and measurement & reliability. If you know the problem in engineering terms, the guide points to a clear next step.

Decision guide

Capability matrices

Best-in-classBest-in-classFully supportedFully supportedPartial or limitedPartial / limitedNot availableNot available

Simulation tools

Simulation-tool capability matrix
CapabilityFlothermFLOEFDSTAR-CCM+Simcenter 3D ThermalAmesimFlomasterHEEDSCalibre 3DThermalInnovator3D IC
System-level electronics CFDBest-in-classFully supportedFully supportedNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
CAD-embedded thermal-flow (NX / Solid Edge / Creo)Not availableBest-in-classNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Multiphysics / two-phase / immersionNot availableNot availableBest-in-classPartial or limitedNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Radiation-dominant (space / vacuum)Not availableNot availableFully supportedBest-in-classNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
Thermal-structural coupling / stress & deformationNot availableNot availableFully supportedBest-in-classNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
1D fluid networks (loops, HVAC)Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableFully supportedBest-in-classNot availableNot availableNot available
1D multi-domain system sim (control-coupled)Not availableNot availableNot availableNot availableBest-in-classFully supportedNot availableNot availableNot available
Automated design exploration / optimizationFully supportedFully supportedFully supportedFully supportedFully supportedFully supportedBest-in-classNot availableNot available
Reduced-order thermal models (BCI-ROM)Best-in-classNot availableNot availablePartial or limitedNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot available
3D IC / chiplet junction temperatureNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableBest-in-classFully supported
Package architecture & floorplanningNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableNot availableBest-in-class

Measurement & reliability tools

Measurement and reliability tool capability matrix
CapabilitySimcenter Micred T3SterSimcenter Micred Power TesterSimcenter Micred DynTIMSimcenter Micred Industrial T3Ster
Structure-function Rth / Zth measurement (JESD51-14)Best-in-classFully supportedFully supportedFully supported
Accelerated power cycling (AQG 324 / AEC-Q104)Not availableBest-in-classNot availableNot available
In-situ TIM characterization (real stack-up)Fully supportedNot availableBest-in-classPartial or limited
Non-destructive die-attach inspectionFully supportedNot availableNot availableBest-in-class
Production-line 100% thermal screeningNot availableNot availableNot availableBest-in-class
SPC / handler / ATE integrationNot availableNot availableNot availableBest-in-class
Compact Thermal Model generation (JESD15-4)Best-in-classFully supportedNot availableNot available
Frequently asked

Answers engineering teams ask before choosing a tool.

Can I use multiple Simcenter thermal tools together?
Yes — they are designed to. A typical flow is Amesim for system-architecture decisions, Flomaster for fluid-loop sizing, Flotherm or FLOEFD for 3D electronics detail, STAR-CCM+ where multiphysics or two-phase is needed, Simcenter 3D Thermal for coupled thermal-structural, Calibre 3DThermal and Innovator3D IC for chiplet-scale work, HEEDS for cross-tool optimization, and the Simcenter Micred family (T3Ster, Power Tester, DynTIM, Industrial T3Ster) for measurement, reliability and production-floor validation that feeds back into the models.
Which tool is best for someone new to thermal simulation?
FLOEFD if the engineer already lives inside NX, Solid Edge, Creo, CATIA V5 or SolidWorks — no separate meshing step, no geometry rebuild. Flotherm if the work is electronics cooling and the team has (or will have) a dedicated thermal engineer, because SmartParts and the Cartesian solver make electronics workflows fast once learned. Electro Source runs both onboarding paths.
I currently use Ansys Icepak — why switch?
Two reasons customers most often cite. First, Flotherm's SmartParts library and JEDEC-compliant package characterization pipeline shorten electronics model build time, and BCI-ROM export lets you ship IP-protected thermal models to downstream customers. Second, the same portfolio also gives you FLOEFD inside CAD for design engineers, HEEDS for cross-tool optimization, and the Micred hardware family — so simulation, measurement and reliability all correlate on a common basis, not across incompatible tools.
Can STAR-CCM+ replace Flotherm for electronics cooling?
It can, but usually shouldn't. Flotherm's Cartesian solver, SmartParts library and JEDEC-compliant package workflow are purpose-built for electronics and are faster to iterate for standard electronics-cooling problems. STAR-CCM+ is the right choice when the physics goes beyond that — two-phase immersion, dielectric boiling, radiation-dominant enclosures, rotating machinery, or coupled thermal-structural on the same mesh. Many customers run both.
What makes Simcenter Micred T3Ster different from other thermal measurement methods?
1 µs time resolution and 0.01 °C sensitivity applied to the differential and cumulative structure function, which lets Simcenter Micred T3Ster resolve the thermal stack layer-by-layer non-destructively — die, die-attach, substrate, TIM, heatsink. That is what makes it the reference for JEDEC JESD51-14 Rth_jc extraction and for measurement-validated Compact Thermal Models that feed directly into Flotherm.
Can Simcenter Micred Power Tester replace traditional power cycling equipment?
For most modern power-electronics work, yes — and it does more. Simcenter Micred Power Tester runs ΔTj-controlled cycling with in-situ Rth monitoring after every cycle, so degradation is visible as it develops rather than only at end-of-life. That is what AQG 324, AEC-Q101 and AEC-Q104 workflows increasingly expect, and it produces the layer-by-layer failure-precursor data older constant-current rigs cannot.
How does Simcenter Micred DynTIM differ from ASTM D5470 TIM measurement?
ASTM D5470 measures a TIM between two idealized flat metal surfaces at controlled pressure and produces the datasheet number. Simcenter Micred DynTIM measures TIM performance dynamically inside the actual assembly stack-up — real surfaces, real pressures, real bond-line thickness. The gap between the two can be 2–5×, which is why simulations built on datasheet TIM numbers frequently fail to match measured reality. Services can still use the ASTM D5470 basis where a specification requires it; DynTIM is for the in-situ answer your product actually sees.
Can Simcenter Micred Industrial T3Ster replace X-ray and C-SAM for die-attach inspection?
In many production settings, yes. Simcenter Micred Industrial T3Ster is non-destructive, runs at production speed, and detects die-attach voids, solder defects and TIM failures via structure-function analysis — often catching latent defects that X-ray and C-SAM sampling regimes miss. It also produces SPC-ready data for closed-loop process control. X-ray and C-SAM stay useful for failure analysis and offline root-cause work.
Still weighing options

A thermal specialist will match the tool to your specific problem.

Talk to a Thermal Specialist →